The last few months the kind of people that pay attention to changes in Washington, DC that are going to affect small farms have been issuing dire warnings about the rules the FDA is writing as part of implementing the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). Unlike the organic advocacy groups, our objective isn't to get you to
petition the FDA. (Besides wasting time and losing focus,
petitioning the FDA probably can't hurt, though.) Now that the FSMA is already law, our best remaining hope is to partner more
deeply and directly with a tight network of customers in ways that
will hopefully enable us to work around the new threats and burdens
to local and homegrown ways of producing food.
As groups like the Carolina Farm Stewardship Association have highlighted, earlier regulatory burdens
have already pushed most of the small-scale meat processors in North Carolina and across the U.S. out of
business. We lost our local meat processor, Johnson Meats, with
whom we had dealt as far as regulatory restrictions had allowed, a
couple years ago. We're very pleased to have found another
processor that will kill on the farm -- they're the last processor
in North Carolina that still kills on the farm, and no new
processors are being allowed to do the same -- but they're further
away, they only process beef for roughly the first six months of the
calendar year (much of which time is booked up a year in advance), and we'd really be limited if they, too, went out of
business.
The FSMA is designed to bring that same kind of pressure on the
one major remaining food sector that was until now mostly free to
bring homegrown style food to farmers' markets and otherwise sell to
the general public, namely fresh produce. The battle for selling
homegrown style produce freely to the general public isn't over yet
-- it will take a little time -- but
the writing is on the wall with the FSMA, and we can be sure that battle is lost.
Of course, it's well worth noting that the foodborne illness
episodes that prompted the passage of the FSMA -- here's a CNN
overview: The
decade's 10 biggest food-borne illness outbreaks -- were all
from very large-scale producers such that individual farms sickened people all
across the country and a half billion eggs, 30 million pounds of
sliced deli meat, etc. were subsequently recalled... yet, the FSMA
created a regulatory system that will disproportionately advantage
the kinds of operations that caused these outbreaks while pushing
the small-scale alternatives out of business. One might blame
corporate influence on the Washington system, but more fundamentally
Washington control is simply a lot more compatible with large
corporate operations than lots of small, diverse farms. In any
case, the FSMA is now law and customers now face an imminent threat
of losing the one good, relatively easy connection they have with a
locally controlled alternative agriculture, namely produce.
How can the local food movement hope to survive without being
able to easily sell produce? Like we said above, we think the
answer is solidifying the gains the local food movement has made in
the last 10+ years by deepening the relationships that already exist
between small farms and their patrons. Going forward it's going to
be much harder for the small farms that offer substantive
alternatives to the mainstream corporate food system to build
connections with new customers, but there's hope in the connections
we've already built, and that's a place from where we might slowly
grow. We lost a major battle when we gave Washington the power to
define Good Agricultural Practice (which now goes with sinister
capital letters and the acronym GAP), but we believe moving beyond the superficial freedom of supermarket style consumerism to real partnerships between consumers and local farms offers
the best hope to continue to pursue alternative ideas to good
agricultural practice, ideas that aren't just minor variations on 30
million pounds of recalled deli meats and all the other many ills of
corporate-industrial agriculture beyond the foodborne illnesses.
Sunday, December 8, 2013
Homegrown grains - buckwheat
Saturday, December 7, 2013
Canned deer
This may not have been the same deer that nibbled on the garden this year but it is satisfying (and delicious) to know it sure won't be nibbling again next year.
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Zone pushing: citrus in Iredell County, NC
A good spot on the south side of our house and a little added protection on the coldest winter nights was about it all it took to produce our first delicious little crop of satsumas. We don't really understand the taxonomy, but our understanding is that satsumas are very similar to but not the same as tangerines, clementines, and mandarin oranges. In any case, they're an outstanding fresh eating fruit.
Goin' nuts
Local pecans are in short supply this fall, likely due to the wet spring and summer. The pecan farmer in Rowan County we normally get a good quantity of in-shell pecans from said there wasn't even enough pecans at his place this year for the squirrels. Not having a local source for our usual staple nut has definitely added to our recent interest in black walnuts. These we can source even more locally - from trees already growing wild on our own farm. With the kids on board, feed sacks worth of walnuts were picked up from under two of our trees this year. Word got out and a neighbor brought over a few more feed sacks full. The hulls were rubbed off and the nuts washed. Then we hung them in feed sacks to cure. Now a little bit at a time, we're cracking them. Many of them are shelling out with relatively large pieces.
Saturday, November 23, 2013
I like my greens
Hattie and the rest of us have really taken to greens this fall. A simple preparation has been working for whatever comes in from the garden - chard, mustard, kale, turnip, collards, tat soi, and mizuna. Wash and chop into about one inch pieces. In a cast iron frying pan, saute some chopped bacon or fat back until browned. Or just add some fat. Saute a chopped onion if you'd like. Then add the greens and stir until they are wilted. Add small amounts of broth or water as needed to keep them cooking until they reach the desired tenderness. Add salt and pepper to taste. Cider vinegar can be a nice addition as well.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus)
It started so small this spring and then just kept growing and growing. Here it is after it's 2nd hair cut, ready for a third (picture taken about a month ago). We dried the cut leaves and have been using them for tea. Stevia and lemon grass has become a favorite. We got the small plant from a friend this spring and set it out after the last chance of frost. It was so vigorous it out competed all the bermuda grass around it, making a small bush in a short time. It is not winter hardy, so we divided the roots six ways and trimmed stems and potted up each new plant separately. We're overwintering them in various locations - a sunny window, a friend's greenhouse, and an outbuilding that doesn't freeze - to determine what is the most successful. We look forward to growing it in different places around the farm next year.
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
Persimmons
It's persimmon season and we're out in force collecting. Our own tree is barely producing four persimmons a day but many neighbors have kindly allowed us to pick up from their trees. A unique favorite is a seedless tree. We've been freezing these whole to eat later with yogurt or as a partially frozen treat. The others we've been processing into pulp and freezing mostly for persimmon puddings.
Stocked up
It's been a hard year on the farm with the constant rains this spring and summer But we have been blessed. Our larder overflows with the harvest.
Mushrooms
Roselle hibiscus
It's funny how a food we'd never even heard of a few years ago has become such a staple of our current diet. A friend gave us some roselle seeds a few years ago. Since then, it's become a big crop for us, not only in the gardens but also as 'landscaping' bushes around the house.
A member of the hibiscus family, this okra relative grows to a huge beautiful bush, about 4 feet in diameter. Along the dark red stems grow short lived hibiscus like flowers. When the petals fall off, a thick calyx is left behind. These flower parts are then harvested for a number of uses.
Most commonly, they are used for a red 'Koolaid' colored tea. Roselle is actually one of the main ingredients of Red Zinger tea. They can be used fresh or dried for tea. If using fresh for tea, simply drop the whole pods in boiling water for 5-8 minutes, about 4 per cup depending on preferred strength. To dry the roselle for later use, it is best to remove the green seed pod in the middle. Our method is to slice horizontally across the bottom then pop out the green balls.
While we enjoy the tea, roselle also makes a great mock cranberry sauce. Again, remove the green seed pods. Then boil the chopped red pieces with a little water, honey and maybe ginger. It's a tasty sauce with chicken or pork. It makes a great topping on cheesecake. Probably the most common way we use it though is as a colorful fruity tasting add-in to yogurt. The sauce preserves great frozen in small jars.
Thursday, September 5, 2013
Piles of peas
Our early plantings of peas drowned so we replanted heavy. They are doing great and are all coming on at once. That means there are plenty to shell on these hot afternoons. We love peas! We call these Nick's since the seed came to us from Eric's great-uncle Nick. They are small but shell pretty easily. They were the winners in our taste test this year.
FRESH POPCORN
We popped our first batch of fresh popcorn today and oh was it good. We grow an heirloom variety (which is basically the opposite of a hybrid) called 'Pennsylvania Dutch butter flavored.' Eric especially likes it at this stage before it's really ready. After another couple weeks of air drying it should pop fully but at this in-between stage some kernels will fully pop but others will only halfway pop. Eric thinks the popcorn flavor seems concentrated in that minimally popped kernel, and he loves the extra crunch. If you follow Eric's example you'll probably break a tooth, so if you don't want to break a tooth don't do it, and if you do do it, let us know how you like your popcorn.
Friday, August 30, 2013
At our table this past week
Eating very local is possible and enjoyable. We thought it might be inspiring and maybe informative to share photos of our meals occasionally. Here's a look at our table over the last week (maybe more). Not every meal is documented as many meals are leftovers and I don't think any breakfast shots got taken either. Confession - breakfast is probably our least local meal of the day. While we have a good rotation of breakfast items, many of them are based on wheat or oats, both of which we currently buy. We have raised wheat and harvested it so the goal of local organic wheat is hopefully around the corner. [As of 2018 we've been growing all our wheat for several years and oats not as long, but not yet enough oats to meet all our needs.] And we do enjoy a good share of corn mush or grits with our own bacon, goat cheese, and tomatoes for breakfast or our yogurt with fruit and nuts. Anyway, hope this all makes you hungry for some local food.
It's funny to look back and see what I actually came up with for a meal! I'm (Melissa) pretty much the sole cook here though Nora is in training and Eric is king of waffles. Three times a day there are 6 of us to feed (plus a WWOOFer at times). I try to think ahead with some menu plans - at least having some meat thawed, but often I'm less than an hour away from a meal with NO idea what will go on the table. There are no boxes of instant mac and cheese in the kitchen. I remember this meal was a last minute idea. Leftover grits, some shitakes the slugs had eaten on -- what we call "farmer grade" -- and my own craving for spring peas (out of the freezer.) I often feel like a cook on the cooking challenge shows with the extra challenge of two little ones crying with hunger on my legs. Anyway, a white sauce from our milk with our onions and shitakes and frozen peas from this spring. |
Worn out from pasta making or fun on the farm. In any case, the pasta with tomato sauce or pesto went over quite well. |
Monday, August 26, 2013
Swarm
Thursday, August 1, 2013
A Week on the Farm
I was a little optimistic today and hung the clothes out to dry - it's
raining on them as I write. But we did have a small window of dry hours
this week and got some weeding done in the garden. I recall dry years
how "clean" the gardens look. This year, it's more like searching for
the produce among the weeds. By now we're getting a little used to the
rain. That said, Saturday's market downpour was like no market we've
ever survived. Thanks for coming out to support the farmers! Eric and
Nora came home a bit chilled, grateful for the kitchen I'd heated up
with canning tomatoes. It has been a tomato week since then. On
harvest days, Eric will bring in box after tray of them and I'll start
the processing line. Drop them in boiling water to peel for whole
tomatoes, slice onto a tray in the oven for roasted tomato sauce, cook
down in a pot on the stove for juice. It was music to my ears the sound
of sealing jars on the kitchen table. We've almost filled our shelves
with our needed supply, so now it's your turn to stock up!
You may know, we are really into taste tests. While this is quite useful - helps us grow the best tasting varieties - it's also fun to blindfold someone and feed him something. Trust. This week it was blueberries. Now 5 years in the ground, our blueberry planting is starting to amount to something. Not sure which variety to plant, we planted 19! You'd think a blueberry is a blueberry, but taken one at a time and really tasted, there are good ones and really, really good ones. (Of course, it's also nice to have early- and late-yielding varieties to extend the fresh blueberry season.) Most members of the family chose the same top four varieties, with the overall winner for the Browns this year being a variety named 'Yadkin.'
New additions always brighten the mood around here and this week we welcomed our third kid, goat kid that is. All three have been nanny (female) kids this year. We found the latest kid in the pasture with her mother where she was healthy and had already figured out nursing. This was a reassuring sight after losing one of our goats about a month ago to late term pregnancy complications.
It's a delicious time of year outdoors. We find ourselves grazing around the farm - cherry tomatoes, blueberries, our first little crop of very organic-looking apples, big tame blackberries, raw beans (just Melissa), grapes, figs...
You may know, we are really into taste tests. While this is quite useful - helps us grow the best tasting varieties - it's also fun to blindfold someone and feed him something. Trust. This week it was blueberries. Now 5 years in the ground, our blueberry planting is starting to amount to something. Not sure which variety to plant, we planted 19! You'd think a blueberry is a blueberry, but taken one at a time and really tasted, there are good ones and really, really good ones. (Of course, it's also nice to have early- and late-yielding varieties to extend the fresh blueberry season.) Most members of the family chose the same top four varieties, with the overall winner for the Browns this year being a variety named 'Yadkin.'
New additions always brighten the mood around here and this week we welcomed our third kid, goat kid that is. All three have been nanny (female) kids this year. We found the latest kid in the pasture with her mother where she was healthy and had already figured out nursing. This was a reassuring sight after losing one of our goats about a month ago to late term pregnancy complications.
It's a delicious time of year outdoors. We find ourselves grazing around the farm - cherry tomatoes, blueberries, our first little crop of very organic-looking apples, big tame blackberries, raw beans (just Melissa), grapes, figs...
Thursday, June 13, 2013
Drowned
We had over a week ending earlier this week when it must have rained well over an inch on average every day. Fortunately, we didn't suffer any noticeable washing or other long-term damage, but we've never before stayed this wet this long in the middle of the growing season. In all but our very best drained soils that meant continually water-logged soils, and the roots of most garden plants can't stand that very long. So all the rain put an end to some crops, left others
rotten in the ground, and set us back on weeding and planting...
dead cabbage plant |
lots of dead cabbage plants (and other cole crops) |
dead bean plants |
rotting carrot |
the field corn still looks good but so do the weeds |
it's not looking like a big crop this year but there's definitely honey to harvest |
the tomatoes are looking pretty good but we have more to prune and tie up |
Monday, May 20, 2013
Grafting
Eric confessed yesterday that he was done grafting for the year (but
this morning that's sounding a little too final). This may not sound
like a big deal, just another farm task completed, but then again,
you've probably never lived with an obsessive grafter. Let's start with
a quick lesson on grafting. In short, you connect a piece of wood from
an outstanding tree on any random tree and that transforms that tree
into an extension of that outstanding tree. Take an apple tree grown
from an apple seed, for example, and you'll get an apple tree that will
most likely produce a fruit not fit to eat. Now cut a twig off a good
apple tree and graft it onto the sorry apple tree and now it too will
produce wonderful fruits. It's an ancient practice, talked about even in
the Bible. While some of Eric's good wood comes from neighbors or a
remarkable tree found growing in a ditch somewhere, he gets most of his
wood sent to him through the mail. Yes, grafting addicts mail each other
twigs! These folks typically meet each other on a fruit forum chat
group. They discuss to exhaustion the pros and cons of all known
cultivars of mulberries, they console each other about the coming
emergence of the 17 year cicadas that could decimate their orchards,
they post pictures of their first blossoms of the year; they are fruit
and nut nuts. And they share wood. Often it's an exchange, you send me
this and I'll send you that. But sometimes they force their favorite
varieties on each other, like a package that arrived this spring full of
seedless native persimmon cultivars we just had to try. In any case, the
6 inch pieces of wood arrive carefully packed with damp paper towels
sealed in plastic bags labeled with names like Rosseyanka, Shinseiki,
and Thomas Myers. They are cut in the winter before the trees start to
grow and stored in the fridge until the trees they'll be grafted onto
are ready. Soon the fridge produce drawers are all taken up with twigs.
A friend suggested we could serve dinner to a family of beavers with all
the wood in our fridge!
In practice, it's interesting, especially when grafting season begins. First, he grafts onto potted plants to be planted out after the graft has established itself. At our house, many of these potted plants found their way into the house "because it's warmer in here and the trees will be ready to graft earlier." I envisioned delicious Asian persimmons and accepted, for a time. The other method is field grafting. Here you have a seedling already established in the ground where you want it, no need to dig a hole or to worry about watering transplanted trees. All you have to do is graft onto it. You simply turn a weed into food. Our pastures and fence lines are full of useless callery pears (with tiny bad tasting pears like the ornamental Bradford pears) and persimmons and mulberries of unknown quality and possibly non-fruiting male trees. So Eric has put wood of known pear or persimmons onto them, marked them with flagging tape (a reminder not to let the cows graze too close). But here there is less control as the elements can be hard on the delicate new grafts. Little tin foil bonnets protect the persimmon sticks until they get established. Many times a weeks, Eric takes the kids out on the graft march into the fields. They too can now spew off the technical terms: scion, stock, cambium, banana graft, bark graft, whip and tongue...
So grafting season is pretty much over. And now we watch as the new buds swell, turn green, and expand into new branches. Yesterday I was checking on the bean planting and Eric came over and asked if I wanted to go look at the nearby Hana Fuyu graft. Jokingly -- although he takes his grafts too seriously to have gotten the joke at first -- I immediately responded that I already had. Once the tree begins to fruit it will be another story: I'll be at least as eager for the fruit as he is to see his buds grow. Our farm is quickly growing into a forest of seedless persimmons, and sweet, crunchy Asian pears, thin-shelled black walnuts, big fat pawpaws, and delicious mulberries. We look forward to sharing, too.
In practice, it's interesting, especially when grafting season begins. First, he grafts onto potted plants to be planted out after the graft has established itself. At our house, many of these potted plants found their way into the house "because it's warmer in here and the trees will be ready to graft earlier." I envisioned delicious Asian persimmons and accepted, for a time. The other method is field grafting. Here you have a seedling already established in the ground where you want it, no need to dig a hole or to worry about watering transplanted trees. All you have to do is graft onto it. You simply turn a weed into food. Our pastures and fence lines are full of useless callery pears (with tiny bad tasting pears like the ornamental Bradford pears) and persimmons and mulberries of unknown quality and possibly non-fruiting male trees. So Eric has put wood of known pear or persimmons onto them, marked them with flagging tape (a reminder not to let the cows graze too close). But here there is less control as the elements can be hard on the delicate new grafts. Little tin foil bonnets protect the persimmon sticks until they get established. Many times a weeks, Eric takes the kids out on the graft march into the fields. They too can now spew off the technical terms: scion, stock, cambium, banana graft, bark graft, whip and tongue...
So grafting season is pretty much over. And now we watch as the new buds swell, turn green, and expand into new branches. Yesterday I was checking on the bean planting and Eric came over and asked if I wanted to go look at the nearby Hana Fuyu graft. Jokingly -- although he takes his grafts too seriously to have gotten the joke at first -- I immediately responded that I already had. Once the tree begins to fruit it will be another story: I'll be at least as eager for the fruit as he is to see his buds grow. Our farm is quickly growing into a forest of seedless persimmons, and sweet, crunchy Asian pears, thin-shelled black walnuts, big fat pawpaws, and delicious mulberries. We look forward to sharing, too.
Sweet potato pies
We couldn't resist, we made a sweet potato pie with our blue sweet potatoes. While we were at it, we did pies of our white potatoes, yellow and orange. They all disappeared pretty quick! |
PRAISE FOR CORNMEAL
We're just back from the mill this week where we had another batch of
our heirloom white 'Floyd' corn ground. After having it ground, we
store it in our freezer until we bring it to you at the market. We don't
understand what makes store-bought cornmeal sit just fine on the shelf
for months, but we wouldn't want to store our cornmeal at room temp for
more than a couple weeks. In any case, there's a huge difference
between our fresh cornmeal and what you're probably used to. To keep it
fresh, our freezer is now full of cornmeal, so this seems like a great
time to sing the praises of cornmeal (we just had some delicious hush
puppies last night). We encourage you to stock up on cornmeal (simply
store in your freezer for months/years or fridge for several weeks) and
enjoy using the only local heirloom grain staple you're likely to find
anywhere. Isn't it time you sourced your most basic food staples from
within your community instead of buying all your grains from huge-scale
farms that you really couldn't know much about even if you wanted to,
that you probably don't even know what state (or country) they're in,
exclusively processed and sold by corporations motivated by anything but
the interests of the health of our community (to say nothing of what's
not even organic)? Is that the system you trust to stand up against the
onslaught of chemicals and biotechnology redefining food? Here are a
few of our favorite cornmeal recipes. You can find more recipes,
including a couple types of cornbread, fritters, and spoonbread, on our
blog. Anson Mills' website also has a lot of good recipes highlighting
heirloom grains. (Let us know, by the way, if you'd like to buy whole
kernel corn for making your own hominy/tortillas/tamales/etc. from
scratch.)
Almost As Good As Aunt Gerri's Hush Puppies
1 2/3 cup cornmeal
1/4 cup flour
1 tsp soda
1 tsp honey
black pepper
2 eggs
1 cup buttermilk
1/2 cup finely chopped onion
Mix well. Drop in heaping teaspoonfuls into hot fat. Flip and cook until well browned on both side.
Cornmeal Pancakes
1 1/2 cups cornmeal
1/4 cup flour
1 tsp soda
1 tsp salt
1 tsp honey
2 cups buttermilk
2 tbs butter or oil
1 slightly beaten egg yolk
1 stiffly beaten egg white
Mix dry ingredients. Add buttermilk, fat, and egg yolk; blend well. Fold in egg white. Let stand 10 minutes. Bake on hot griddle.
Corn Mush
we'll just give you a link for this one:
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-cornmeal-mush.htm
Almost As Good As Aunt Gerri's Hush Puppies
1 2/3 cup cornmeal
1/4 cup flour
1 tsp soda
1 tsp honey
black pepper
2 eggs
1 cup buttermilk
1/2 cup finely chopped onion
Mix well. Drop in heaping teaspoonfuls into hot fat. Flip and cook until well browned on both side.
Cornmeal Pancakes
1 1/2 cups cornmeal
1/4 cup flour
1 tsp soda
1 tsp salt
1 tsp honey
2 cups buttermilk
2 tbs butter or oil
1 slightly beaten egg yolk
1 stiffly beaten egg white
Mix dry ingredients. Add buttermilk, fat, and egg yolk; blend well. Fold in egg white. Let stand 10 minutes. Bake on hot griddle.
Corn Mush
we'll just give you a link for this one:
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-cornmeal-mush.htm
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Photos from the last month
Saturday, February 23, 2013
DIET THEORIES
We just watched a documentary film about a diet of veganism (plus no
added plant fats/oil) as a way to stop and potentially reverse the
adverse health effects of the standard industrialized diet. We're
definitely not vegans, and we don't mention this film because it
represents us or any of our views, but as farmers we take extra interest
in all the various diet theories and their supporting arguments, and
even diet theories that fail to offer good solutions can be helpful in
assessing the problems.
As we've discussed before, our diet theory -- if we had to give it a name we might call it "radically homegrown" -- isn't based on any kind of nutrition or health theories. In other words, we're strongly inclined to believe that eating a radically homegrown diet while completely ignoring the difficult questions of any and all nutrition theories will actually result in a healthier diet than following the advice of the world's most brilliant nutrition experts, whoever they may be. Are we saying that ignoring nutrition theories can lead to better nutrition? Short answer, yes. How could that be?
First, nutrition science is invariably a very muddy field. If any of the fringe theories (like the one in the film we just watched) were scientifically compelling it would be more than a fringe scientific theory. That's not to say those theories are necessarily wrong, only that the scientific case for any of them is fraught with questions and legitimate doubts. On the other hand mainstream dietary advice like is embodied in the USDA food pyramid seems undeniably damned by its results. In other words, mainstream dietary advice is too closely tied to our problems to reasonably consider it any kind of solution. And, in any case, even if the nutrition experts could agree on a diet theory -- which they can't -- that still leaves the rest of us needing to eat but without the expertise to sort out the advice from conflicting experts. (The arguments that we always find most convincing are the ones making the case that the case for someone else's theory is grossly overstated.) In short, as with the documentary we just watched, every diet theory seems to lose any real scientific footing as soon as it moves beyond criticizing the standard industrialized diet.
So the next question then: what reason is there to trust that a radically homegrown diet offers any better hope of nutrition? First, our current diet-related health problems are clearly the result of the industrialization of our food supply, and a radically homegrown diet is the only alternative (at least in the industrialized world today.) Secondly, although the nutrition science is very muddy, one thing that seems very clear to us is that the giant food and agriculture corporations (and the government and university systems that serve them) aren't fundamentally pursuing any kind of health (of persons, soils, waters, air, animals, communities, etc. -- which, of course, are all deeply interconnected), but rather all large corporations are structured so as to ensure a narrow focus on corporate and executive profit. Surely dependence on that corporate system, no matter how much it conforms to any superficial diet theory, is fundamentally at odds with good health. If we are to have any real nutrition choices at all, we're convinced the first step needs to be breaking loose of the corporate-industrial grip on our diets.
In that light, a question this documentary raised, as all nutrition theories do for us, is how compatible is veganism with a radically homegrown diet versus dependent on an industrialized corporate food supply. There is a limited point on which we think vegans score some points here. In recent years vegans have commonly made the case that animal products increase our dependency on the evils of the corporate-industrial system. They'll say that animals are an inefficient use of grain crops, i.e. that the grain fed to animals would go a lot further if fed directly to people. If we lay the nutritional and gastronomic problems with that idea aside, we think it has to be conceded that they have a real point: raising animals strictly on field crops grown for the purpose of feeding animals is highly questionable. (So, of course, is raising annual crops for the purpose of feeding our cars, which now consume more of our most planted field crop (corn) than all farm animals combined.) The limits we see in their argument are that (1) exchanging dependency on large quantities of grain for dependency on smaller quantities of industrialized grain doesn't really solve the problem, and (2) although modern industrialized agriculture completely fails to realize it, animals offer all sorts of potential for making food out of things that aren't food to start with. The most important example of this second point is grass, and the benefits of grass are huge. Especially in regions like ours where much of the land is quite susceptible to erosion, a permanent cover of grass is surely the most sustainable farm use of land. Pasture also drastically reduces the pressure on farmers to depend as heavily or at all on herbicides, insecticides, fossil fuel-powered tractors and combines, genetically modified seed, etc. Much more could be said about the gains to be had from farm animals and from grass, in particular, but the point here is that animals offer lots of potential (even if commonly unrealized) for reducing our dependency on the corporate-industrial food system.
This is a bit of a tangent, but to be clear, "pastured" pork and poultry and eggs even from "organic" (whether officially or unofficially) family farmers selling directly at small farmers' markets rarely redefine the equation any more than their supermarket counterparts: simply keeping animals on pasture while feeding them complete rations of combine-harvested annual field crops (which is the case with the vast majority of large- and small-scale "pastured" and/or "organic" pork, poultry, and eggs) does nothing to silence the vegan argument we've discussed. Swine and poultry and other animals certainly have lots of potential in a radically homegrown system of agriculture, too, but so long as farmers and consumers continue to measure these possibilities against the artificial cheapness of their industrialized counterparts any market for radically homegrown pork or poultry will remain practically non-existent. In the meantime, we would concede that vegans score valid points here, too.
But truly grass-fed/grain-free beef and dairy (and goat meat, lamb, wool, leather, etc., not to mention wild game) does radically redefine the equations, not just historically but in accessible ways here and now. As practically the whole continent of Africa figured out before us, goat meat and, in our case, also goat milk may be the most sustainable products we produce, and we'd make nearly as strong a case for our beef and cow's dairy. There was an interesting and repeated contrast in the film we just watched that highlights some of these differences. Images of dairy cattle on pasture were contrasted more than once with huge, super-expensive, diesel-powered combines harvesting mono-cropped annual grains. Completely apart from all the questions of sustainability, is the corporate-industrial dependency of the implicit vegan model not starkly obvious, especially in contrast to the pastoral image of dairy cows? There are plenty of misleading pastoral images in today's food marketplaces, but here the vegan advocates (apparently unwittingly) chose images that exposed the flaws of their case. Small herds of all grass-fed livestock are rightly viewed as consistent with sustainability, small family farms, and community food sovereignty. Equivalently homegrown grain and pulse (dry bean, peas, etc.) crops are as non-existent in the industrialized world today as the radically homegrown pork and poultry we already lamented. As with pork and poultry, grains and pulses have plenty of potential in a radically homegrown system of agriculture, but that potential is largely lost to mass-produced corporate counterparts.
One more thing deserves mention on the subject of veganism and a radically homegrown diet. With the diet promoted by this film as with every other example of veganism we've encountered, simple homegrown foods are replaced with fake counterparts: milk is replaced with rice or almond "milk" -- it's worth noting, too, that we live in the most dairy rich county in North Carolina, but rice and almonds, of course, aren't grown here and are very marginally adaptable if at all -- turkey with "tofurky," eggs with "egg substitute", etc., etc. Avoiding real milk or turkey or eggs commonly has the result of forcing consumers to turn to corporate-industrial foods from far away, often in less homegrown, more processed manifestations. This is an aspect of veganism to which we definitely object, and we suspect that it's an unavoidable aspect of any diet theory that shuns any major food groups.
Obviously there's plenty of controversy to stir up with these questions, but there's also lots of room for agreement. Proponents of veganism and paleo diets and "traditional" diets and low-carb diets and the USDA food pyramid and raw foodies, etc. together with us, can all potentially agree that moving away from sugar and corn syrup, artificial flavors, preservatives, and sweeteners, white flour, pre-processed foods, confinement style animal products, and chemical-intensive field and garden crops would be an improvement. These are the most emblematic parts of the standard diet in the industrialized world in which we live. And it seems quite plausible that drastically reducing these things could indeed solve a majority of our dramatic, diet-related problems. Without paying any particular attention to any questions of diet or nutrition, pursuing a radically homegrown diet would necessarily accomplish all these things, and it's something any of us can understand unassisted (and unmanipulated) by any experts.
As we've discussed before, our diet theory -- if we had to give it a name we might call it "radically homegrown" -- isn't based on any kind of nutrition or health theories. In other words, we're strongly inclined to believe that eating a radically homegrown diet while completely ignoring the difficult questions of any and all nutrition theories will actually result in a healthier diet than following the advice of the world's most brilliant nutrition experts, whoever they may be. Are we saying that ignoring nutrition theories can lead to better nutrition? Short answer, yes. How could that be?
First, nutrition science is invariably a very muddy field. If any of the fringe theories (like the one in the film we just watched) were scientifically compelling it would be more than a fringe scientific theory. That's not to say those theories are necessarily wrong, only that the scientific case for any of them is fraught with questions and legitimate doubts. On the other hand mainstream dietary advice like is embodied in the USDA food pyramid seems undeniably damned by its results. In other words, mainstream dietary advice is too closely tied to our problems to reasonably consider it any kind of solution. And, in any case, even if the nutrition experts could agree on a diet theory -- which they can't -- that still leaves the rest of us needing to eat but without the expertise to sort out the advice from conflicting experts. (The arguments that we always find most convincing are the ones making the case that the case for someone else's theory is grossly overstated.) In short, as with the documentary we just watched, every diet theory seems to lose any real scientific footing as soon as it moves beyond criticizing the standard industrialized diet.
So the next question then: what reason is there to trust that a radically homegrown diet offers any better hope of nutrition? First, our current diet-related health problems are clearly the result of the industrialization of our food supply, and a radically homegrown diet is the only alternative (at least in the industrialized world today.) Secondly, although the nutrition science is very muddy, one thing that seems very clear to us is that the giant food and agriculture corporations (and the government and university systems that serve them) aren't fundamentally pursuing any kind of health (of persons, soils, waters, air, animals, communities, etc. -- which, of course, are all deeply interconnected), but rather all large corporations are structured so as to ensure a narrow focus on corporate and executive profit. Surely dependence on that corporate system, no matter how much it conforms to any superficial diet theory, is fundamentally at odds with good health. If we are to have any real nutrition choices at all, we're convinced the first step needs to be breaking loose of the corporate-industrial grip on our diets.
In that light, a question this documentary raised, as all nutrition theories do for us, is how compatible is veganism with a radically homegrown diet versus dependent on an industrialized corporate food supply. There is a limited point on which we think vegans score some points here. In recent years vegans have commonly made the case that animal products increase our dependency on the evils of the corporate-industrial system. They'll say that animals are an inefficient use of grain crops, i.e. that the grain fed to animals would go a lot further if fed directly to people. If we lay the nutritional and gastronomic problems with that idea aside, we think it has to be conceded that they have a real point: raising animals strictly on field crops grown for the purpose of feeding animals is highly questionable. (So, of course, is raising annual crops for the purpose of feeding our cars, which now consume more of our most planted field crop (corn) than all farm animals combined.) The limits we see in their argument are that (1) exchanging dependency on large quantities of grain for dependency on smaller quantities of industrialized grain doesn't really solve the problem, and (2) although modern industrialized agriculture completely fails to realize it, animals offer all sorts of potential for making food out of things that aren't food to start with. The most important example of this second point is grass, and the benefits of grass are huge. Especially in regions like ours where much of the land is quite susceptible to erosion, a permanent cover of grass is surely the most sustainable farm use of land. Pasture also drastically reduces the pressure on farmers to depend as heavily or at all on herbicides, insecticides, fossil fuel-powered tractors and combines, genetically modified seed, etc. Much more could be said about the gains to be had from farm animals and from grass, in particular, but the point here is that animals offer lots of potential (even if commonly unrealized) for reducing our dependency on the corporate-industrial food system.
This is a bit of a tangent, but to be clear, "pastured" pork and poultry and eggs even from "organic" (whether officially or unofficially) family farmers selling directly at small farmers' markets rarely redefine the equation any more than their supermarket counterparts: simply keeping animals on pasture while feeding them complete rations of combine-harvested annual field crops (which is the case with the vast majority of large- and small-scale "pastured" and/or "organic" pork, poultry, and eggs) does nothing to silence the vegan argument we've discussed. Swine and poultry and other animals certainly have lots of potential in a radically homegrown system of agriculture, too, but so long as farmers and consumers continue to measure these possibilities against the artificial cheapness of their industrialized counterparts any market for radically homegrown pork or poultry will remain practically non-existent. In the meantime, we would concede that vegans score valid points here, too.
But truly grass-fed/grain-free beef and dairy (and goat meat, lamb, wool, leather, etc., not to mention wild game) does radically redefine the equations, not just historically but in accessible ways here and now. As practically the whole continent of Africa figured out before us, goat meat and, in our case, also goat milk may be the most sustainable products we produce, and we'd make nearly as strong a case for our beef and cow's dairy. There was an interesting and repeated contrast in the film we just watched that highlights some of these differences. Images of dairy cattle on pasture were contrasted more than once with huge, super-expensive, diesel-powered combines harvesting mono-cropped annual grains. Completely apart from all the questions of sustainability, is the corporate-industrial dependency of the implicit vegan model not starkly obvious, especially in contrast to the pastoral image of dairy cows? There are plenty of misleading pastoral images in today's food marketplaces, but here the vegan advocates (apparently unwittingly) chose images that exposed the flaws of their case. Small herds of all grass-fed livestock are rightly viewed as consistent with sustainability, small family farms, and community food sovereignty. Equivalently homegrown grain and pulse (dry bean, peas, etc.) crops are as non-existent in the industrialized world today as the radically homegrown pork and poultry we already lamented. As with pork and poultry, grains and pulses have plenty of potential in a radically homegrown system of agriculture, but that potential is largely lost to mass-produced corporate counterparts.
One more thing deserves mention on the subject of veganism and a radically homegrown diet. With the diet promoted by this film as with every other example of veganism we've encountered, simple homegrown foods are replaced with fake counterparts: milk is replaced with rice or almond "milk" -- it's worth noting, too, that we live in the most dairy rich county in North Carolina, but rice and almonds, of course, aren't grown here and are very marginally adaptable if at all -- turkey with "tofurky," eggs with "egg substitute", etc., etc. Avoiding real milk or turkey or eggs commonly has the result of forcing consumers to turn to corporate-industrial foods from far away, often in less homegrown, more processed manifestations. This is an aspect of veganism to which we definitely object, and we suspect that it's an unavoidable aspect of any diet theory that shuns any major food groups.
Obviously there's plenty of controversy to stir up with these questions, but there's also lots of room for agreement. Proponents of veganism and paleo diets and "traditional" diets and low-carb diets and the USDA food pyramid and raw foodies, etc. together with us, can all potentially agree that moving away from sugar and corn syrup, artificial flavors, preservatives, and sweeteners, white flour, pre-processed foods, confinement style animal products, and chemical-intensive field and garden crops would be an improvement. These are the most emblematic parts of the standard diet in the industrialized world in which we live. And it seems quite plausible that drastically reducing these things could indeed solve a majority of our dramatic, diet-related problems. Without paying any particular attention to any questions of diet or nutrition, pursuing a radically homegrown diet would necessarily accomplish all these things, and it's something any of us can understand unassisted (and unmanipulated) by any experts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)